in

Over 200 Democrats Side with Republicans to Deal Big Blow to Biden

Source: Flickr/The White House

More than 200 Democrats, in an unexpected turn of events, voted with Republicans to deal the Biden Administration a massive blow. This partnership of America’s two major political parties has shaken up the country’s political landscape. It is a big setback for the Biden Administration which has sought to bring about various reforms across some areas

Biden Proposes A Federal Funding Cut To School Sport Shooting Programs

The matter that brought Democrats and Republicans together was a proposal by the Biden Administration to cut federal funding for school shooting programs like hunting and archery.

Source: Flickr

According to the administration, teaching such things in schools does not align with their educational targets and could end up increasing gun crimes. Both Democrats and Republicans however opposed this position strongly.

The House Vote Did Not Approve Of Biden’s Proposal

This week, the House of Representatives, which is controlled by democrats, did not approve this proposal from the Biden Administration.

Source: Flickr/Ron Cogswell

The vote wasn’t even close; it was something of a landslide against what President Biden had proposed. It is a significant setback for him when his own party acts against him on such a scale.

The Protecting Hunting Heritage and Education Act

As a reaction to this idea put forward by the Biden Administration, Congress passed Protecting Hunting Heritage and Education Act. This was done through its lower chamber which comprises more than 200 Democrats and almost all Republicans.

Source: Wikimedia Commons

This bill passed overwhelmingly by 424-1 vote demonstrates there is strong bipartisan support for these programs.

The Department Of Education Limited Funding On Hunting And Archery

This decision took place after it was discovered that during summer time this year Department of Education (DOE) limited funding on hunting as well as archery instruction in schools.

Source: Rawpixel

For both parties criticism followed that discovery where its opponents claimed such actions were beyond mandate given to DOE by Biden administration hence undermined importance of these activities leading to respect for nature or preservation of wildlife.

Hunters Are Some Of “The Best Conservationists”

“The best conservationists are hunters and fishers”, declared Rep Mark Green (R-TN). Many other individuals’ opinion also mirrored this point arguing that hunting and fishing are not just games but also essential tools for wildlife management and conservation.

Source: Linkedin

They believe that these skills can be instilled in students if they are taught while still in their respective schools where as a result they will not only become responsible to nature but also respect it.

Student’s Participation In Outdoor Activities Limited

Green also said students ought to “participate in enriching athletic activities that foster an appreciation for nature and the ability to focus on a goal.” According to critics, hunting and archery programs proposed by Biden administration impart more than just bow shooting or firearms handling knowledge to the pupils.

Source: Wikimedia/Staff Sgt. Sheila deVera

These proponents claim that such subjects help children develop discipline, patience, and an enduring love for nature above other things.

The Decision Would Impact Over 50,000 Children

Green alleged that within Tennessee alone this decision would have affected over 50,000 children. This statistic demonstrates how far reaching President Biden’s proposal might be.

Source: Getarchive

Detractors say thousands of kids nationwide may never get the chance to learn practical expertise or gain insight into wildlife conservation due to him.

The Education Department’s Stance Was That Funding Would Be Cut

Education department had told hunting education leaders in July that all federal funding for school programs would be pulled away from them. This course of action came about as a result of the administration’s notion that such programs were not consistent with the educational plan of American schools.

Source: Flickr/NYS DEC

Nevertheless, this position received significant push back from Democrats and Republicans who felt that the decision was unjustifiably being made by the administration.

The Decision Was Met With Strong Protest By Outdoor Activists

The Department of Education’s decision was met with strong protest. Advocates for hunting and archery emphasized that many schools had already taken these courses off their curriculums because of government coercion.

Source: Mhsvoxonline

They claimed that closing such programs will not allow students to acquire valuable skills and a more profound interest in nature and wildlife conservation.

The National Shooting Sports Foundation’s Response

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) was among the organizations that voiced their opposition to the Biden Administration’s decision.

Source: NSSF

Lawrence Keane, senior vice president of the NSSF, stated, “The Department of Education and Secretary Cardona are blatantly misconstruing the law to withhold funding from schools that choose to teach beneficial courses like hunter safety and archery.”

The National Archery in the Schools Program’s Response

The National Archery in the Schools Program (NASP) also expressed their concern over the decision. Tommy Floyd, the president of NASP, stated that his program impacts well over 1 million students in nearly every state.

Source: Flickr

He argued that the decision by the Department of Education would have a significant impact on these students and could potentially lead to the loss of these valuable programs.

The Department of Education Stood By Its Stance

Department of Education stood its ground despite widespread condemnation. This view implied the department believed they were acting within their rights based on existing laws; any changes would have to be effected through legislation.

Source: Wikimedia/Fry1989

This suggests that it thought the action it took was consistent with existing statutes requiring new legislation if alterations were made.

The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act

The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA) was a bill that many believed to be a “gun control” bill. It was advertised as a way to create “safer, more inclusive and positive” schools.

Source: X/The White House

The bill was signed off by Biden in the summer of 2022. Critics argue that the BSCA was used as a pretext to cut funding for hunting and archery programs in schools.

The Event Is Significant For Democrats And Republicans Alike

This event marks a significant moment in the Biden Administration. More than 200 Democrats joined Republicans to deliver a crushing blow to Biden. The overwhelming opposition from his own party is an indication of how hotly debated this issue was.

Source: Wikimedia/U.S. Secretary of Defense

This also points out the gulf between moderates and progressives in the Democratic Party as well as the challenges faced by President Biden in pursuing his policy objectives. It has far-reaching implications on Biden’s presidency and what he can achieve going forward.

What do you think?

200 Points
Upvote Downvote
Avatar

Written by Sally Reed

Leave a Reply

Avatar

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Thousands Of People Quit Their Jobs in Florida

California Housing Market Drops To Unprecedented Lows